Skip to main content

Colorado Governor Candidates

Colorado Governors Candidates

Accountability Scoring: Score Meaning When to Use 1.0 Fully consistent Public statements match voting record or actions across time & audiences Pro-Citizen, Pro-Constitution, Pro-Law Enforcement  0.75 Mostly consistent Generally aligned, but occasional weak vote, carve-out, or exception 0.5 Mixed record Roughly even split between stated position, votes, or public action. Inconsistencies on Pro-Citizen and Pro-Government 0.25 Mostly inconsistent Frequent contradiction, but some limited alignment exists 0.0 Material contradiction Statements consistently conflict with voting record, public statements, or actions. Pro-Government, Pro-Illegal Immigrant, Pro-Socialism (Government Control) Scoring is based on:  Public statements  Legislative records  Sponsored or supported legislation  Public policy platforms  Documented voting behavior   Original File Candidates Without Legislative Voting Records These candidates cannot have rhetoric-vs-vote con...

Greg Lopez

#5 Greg Lopez

Independent
Total Score
11.0 / 21
52.4%

Illegal Immigration Enforcement

0.50 Inconsistent / Mixed
As Republican (2022): favored strict enforcement. As independent (2026): "people over politics" framing.

Party switch and softer 2026 messaging creates inconsistency vs. 2022 hardline positions.

Source: Colorado Sun Jan 2026 / Denver Gazette / Colorado Newsline Oct 2025

Sanctuary State Policies

0.50 Inconsistent / Mixed
Opposed sanctuary policies as Republican. Now running as unaffiliated courting broader voter base.

Prior strong opposition now softened in public messaging. Monitor for explicit reversal.

Source: Campaign history / Colorado Politics Jan 2026

Law & Order / Public Safety

0.75 Mostly Pro-Citizen
"Colorado turned into ugly twin sister of California by single-party rule." Consistent public safety critique.

Consistent law and order messaging across party switches. No material contradiction on this issue.

Source: Colorado Newsline Oct 2025 debate

Gun Rights

0.50 Inconsistent / Mixed
Supported 2A as Republican. Current independent posture is less specific; appeals to broader electorate.

Position appears consistent in principle but public rhetoric has softened with party switch.

Source: Campaign history

Free Speech

0.50 Inconsistent / Mixed
Advocated conservative speech rights as Republican. Current independent messaging more moderate.

Consistent underlying position but rhetorical shift post-party-switch creates ambiguity.

Source: Campaign statements / Colorado Politics

Tax Burden

0.50 Inconsistent / Mixed
Supported tax cuts as Republican. DOGE committee experience cited. Less specific as independent.

Underlying position likely consistent but verification harder post-party-switch.

Source: Colorado Newsline debate Oct 2025

Government Spending

0.50 Inconsistent / Mixed
"Zombie programs" elimination via DOGE approach. Baseline budgeting reform. Three-budget proposal.

Specific and consistent spending reform proposals across campaign. The clearest consistent position for Lopez.

Source: Colorado Politics Oct 2025 debate

Regulatory Burden on Business

0.50 Inconsistent / Mixed
Small Business Administration background. Supports deregulation. Less specific as independent.

SBA background provides credible deregulation record but party switch clouds current platform specificity.

Source: Campaign / SBA background

Energy Policy

0.50 Inconsistent / Mixed
Supported fossil fuels as Republican. Independent posture less defined on energy.

Unclear whether energy position has shifted with party switch. Ambiguous.

Source: Campaign history

Property Rights

0.50 Inconsistent / Mixed
Supported property rights as Republican. Independent platform less specific.

Consistent in principle; less documented in current campaign.

Source: Campaign history

Housing Affordability

0.75 Mostly Pro-Citizen
Cited housing affordability as key issue. DOGE efficiency framing applied to housing costs.

Consistent housing affordability messaging across party transition. One of the stronger Lopez consistencies.

Source: Colorado Newsline debate / campaign

Homelessness Policy

0.50 Inconsistent / Mixed
Conservative enforcement approach historically; less specific in current unaffiliated positioning.

Position shift risk from party change. Insufficient current record to confirm consistency.

Source: Campaign history

Education Reform

0.50 Inconsistent / Mixed
Supported school choice as Republican. Independent platform less defined on curriculum specifics.

Likely consistent but not well-documented in current campaign phase.

Source: Campaign history

Healthcare Access

0.75 Mostly Pro-Citizen
Supported market-based healthcare as Republican and in SBA role. No publicly documented reversal.

REVISED: Healthcare (excluding gender-medical framing) positions appear consistent. Market-based approach not contradicted. Score reflects limited current documentation but no material contradiction.

Source: Campaign history / SBA background

Water Rights

0.75 Mostly Pro-Citizen
Experience in Colorado water issues through congressional service and SBA. Supports local water control.

Consistent and credible on water rights from brief Congressional service.

Source: Congressional record 2024-2025

Agricultural Protection

0.75 Mostly Pro-Citizen
SBA background serving rural communities. Congressional service representing eastern Colorado ag areas.

Relevant experience. Consistent with agricultural protection positioning.

Source: SBA background / congressional record

Election Integrity

0.25 Mostly Pro-Government
2022: Alleged 2020 election stolen by Democrats. 2026: "People over politics" — never publicly walked back.

Clear inconsistency: election denial claim in 2022 never renounced as he courts unaffiliated voters in 2026.

Source: Denver Gazette / Wikipedia / Colorado Sun Jan 2026

Constitutional Rights

0.50 Inconsistent / Mixed
Strong constitutionalist as Republican. Independent positioning has moderated public rhetoric.

Underlying position likely consistent but party switch creates presentation-level inconsistency.

Source: Campaign history

Government Transparency

0.50 Inconsistent / Mixed
"End to divisiveness." DOGE committee participation. General transparency rhetoric.

Consistent transparency messaging but limited specificity makes it hard to score above 0.5.

Source: Colorado Newsline / campaign

Parental Rights: Minor Medical Interventions

0.50 Inconsistent / Mixed
Website states he is "personally... socially conservative" and believes in "conserving human life." As Republican (2022), fully aligned with parental rights position. As independent (2026), deliberately softened posture and avoids specific statements on minor gender interventions to attract unaffiliated voters.

Score 0.5 per guideline: Inconsistent. Self-described social conservative but party switch and "people over politics" framing has created deliberate ambiguity on this specific issue. Has not publicly committed to restricting minor gender interventions as independent candidate. Underlying position likely pro-parental rights but public posture is evasive.

Source: https://www.greglopez.co/meet-greg | https://coloradosun.com/2025/04/14/greg-lopez-colorado-gubernatorial-bid-2026/